Beyond Structured Settlements

Risk Settlement Planning Practicum

Sheltered from the violent storms that unleashed dozens of tornadoes across Oklahoma and the plains states on April 13-14, 2012, the University of Tulsa College of Law hosted the Richard B. Risk Jr. Settlement Planning Practicum which organizers believe was the first time any law school has sponsored a settlement planning educational conference.

Risk, a national authority on structured settlement law and one of the founders of the Society of Settlement Planners (SSP), endowed the settlement planning practicum which is expected to become an annual event for attorneys and law students. Risk invited and introduced the practicum presenters in the following speaking order: Joseph Tombs, Patrick Hindert, Mark Popolizio, Jeremy Babener, Jack Meligan and Professor Carl Pierce.

Joseph Tombs

Tombs, a lawyer, certified financial planner and former SSP President who, working with Risk, helped organize the Registered Settlement Planner (RSP) certification program, addressed "Common Issues Attorneys Face When Settling Cases". As part of his presentation, Tombs contrasted settlement planning and financial planning. One primary difference, according to Tombs, is the relative importance in settlement planning of "dissipation risk". Other differentiating factors identified by Tombs include the importance of: government benefits, medical forecasting and special needs legal issues. Tombs discussed structured settlements as a core settlement planning tool that combines relatively low investment and dissipation risks.

Tombs emphasized the multi-professional skill sets settlement planning requires and described settlement planning as an evolving profession stating: "The more we study and practice settlement planning, the more we realize its complexity and understand its challenges." He offered the following definition for settlement planning: "a profession helping recipients of settlement proceeds use those proceeds to achieve post-loss goals and transition successfully to post-settlement financial life."

Patrick Hindert

In his presentation titled "The History of Structured Settlements", Hindert (co-author of "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" and author of S2KM's blog) provided a visual analysis featuring schematic diagrams to explain how structured settlement has evolved from a claim management tool into a core component of the larger and more complex settlement planning profession - and how competing business models have restricted the growth of the structured settlement annuity market.

Hindert stated key structured settlement stakeholders have succumbed to "path dependence" by failing to strategically study and analyze continuing industry changes. Structured settlement business models and practices that once made sense and represented "industry standards", according to Hindert, have survived despite the eclipse of their justification, benefit and/or better alternatives.

Hindert described settlement planning as an "emergent system" and quoted John McWhorter, a linguist at Columbia University, to help explain the significance for structured settlements:

"Emergent systems [settlement planning] are ones in which many different elements interact. The pattern of interaction then produces a new element [settlement planning] that is greater than the sum of the parts, which then exercises a top-down influence on the constituent elements [including structured settlements]."

To improve and grow the structured settlement market, Hindert recommended more detailed and comprehensive study of alternative structured settlement payment models and life cycles within the broader context of settlement planning as an important and necessary first step.

Mark Popolizio

A nationally recognized legal authority in Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) compliance and a current board member of the National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP), Popolizio addressed how Medicare impacts settlement planning. Starting with an introductory Medicare road map, he next discussed CMS' reimbursement rights for conditional Medicare payments - who is at risk; what is Medicare's recovery amount; how to challenge conditional payments; how to obtain information; CMS' most recently announced policies and payment options; and recent case law developments.

Popolizio also discussed Medicare set-aside arrangements (MSAs), in the context of both workers compensation and liability cases, as CMS' recommended method for protecting Medicare's future interests under the MSP Act. For liability cases, he began by emphasizing why the key issue is not: "Are liability MSAs required?" Instead, Popolizio reviewed two recent CMS memoranda providing informal information about how CMS looks at liability MSAs. Finally, Popolizio offered his own recommendations (a three-step process) for approaching the liability MSA issue and also reviewed recent related case law.

Jeremy Babener

Babener, a rising star among structured settlement legal and tax experts, offered a comprehensive overview of "Taxation in Personal Injury Cases". He began by outlining sources for tax authority, the variables for tax liability and the character of income. Next, he discussed the exclusion for personal injury damages and explained the language of IRC 104(a)(2) before addressing other damages in personal injury cases - past and future medical expenses; punitive damages; and pre and post-judgment interest.

Babener explained the importance of documentation, including the complaint and the settlement agreement, to maximize the exclusion for personal injury damages. He highlighted specific facts that frequently create problems with the IRS and conversely how to encourage the IRS to respect the documents so as to obtain the preferred tax result. Babener concluded by addressing these additional settlement tax considerations: legal expenses; structured settlements; qualified settlement funds; and transfers of structured settlement payment rights.

Jack Meligan

Meligan, a founder and current President of the SSP, discussed "Pitfalls in Settlement Planning and How to Avoid Malpractice"; offered reasons why personal injury claimants and their attorneys need settlement planning advice from a qualified professional or team of professionals; and reviewed an example of a settlement plan. In addition, Meligan:

• Summarized three cases (Grillo; Lyons; and Spencer) to demonstrate why structured settlements need to be considered and risks associated with certain business behavior;
• Cited statistics from American Bar Association studies to underscore the frequency and risk of malpractice cases against personal injury attorneys;
• Spotlighted danger areas for plaintiff attorneys: MSP compliance; deductability of attorney fees; and documentation of confidentiality clauses; and
• Cautioned plaintiff attorneys against failing to retain an independent settlement advisor; or to advise their clients about all settlement options (including the pros and cons of structured settlements); or to completely document their files as proof of their best practices.

Professor Carl Pierce

Professor Pierce is the W. Allen Separk Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Howard Baker, Jr. Center for Public Policy at the University of Tennessee. Among his professional activities, Professor Pierce has served as Reporter for the Tennessee Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professionalism and as Associate Reporter for the American Bar Association Special Commission on Evaluation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. During 2007-2008, Professor Pierce served as Consultant to the Society of Settlement Planners (SSP) and helped review and draft the SSP's Standards of Professional Conduct for Settlement Planners (SSP Standards).

Professor Pierce provided a summary comparative analysis of both the National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA) Statement of Ethics and Professional Responsibility (NSSTA Code of Ethics) and the SSP Standards. Despite substantial experience working with litigators, Professor Pierce acknowledged surprise by the degree of hostility between some plaintiff and defense structured settlement consultants. Professor Pierce:

• Observed that all law school graduates need some exposure to structured settlements and settlement planning;
• Suggested that the business collaboration models among insurance companies, plaintiff attorneys and settlement planners could look very different in the future; and
• Recommended that representatives of NSSTA and SSP meet to discuss and compare their respective statements of ethics and standards.

Congratulations to Richard Risk, the University of Tulsa College of Law and the guest speakers who participated in the Settlement Planning Practicum. S2KM understands that Tulsa College of Law will publish a video compilation of the practicum speaker presentations on YouTube.

ASNP 2011 Annual Meeting

The Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP) hosted its Fifth Annual Conference March 11-12, 2011 in San Francisco. Co-chaired by Kevin Urbatsch and Michael Gilfix, the 2011 ASNP conference highlighted a growing knowledge gap between traditional structured settlement consultants (many of whom aspire to be settlement planners) and special needs attorneys (whose professional focus increasing includes settlement planning).

ASNP is one of three national associations of attorneys, the others being the Special Needs Alliance (SNA) and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA), whose members engage in special needs planning. The primary difference between special needs planning and settlement planning is that special needs planning includes clients whose disabilities result from many causes including but not limited to personal injury or workers compensation accidents.

Beyond the quality of speakers and value of topics, ASNP conferences provide exceptional educational experiences for three additional reasons:

• Handout materials - Whereas most speakers at structured settlement conferences provide attendees with a power point handout or no written handout, most ASNP speakers provide attendees with original, topic-specific professional papers (in addition to outlines and/or power points) captured on a digital thumb drive.
• Sponsors and Exhibitors - Among the several national conferences S2KM attends, ASNP and NAMSAP provide the best interaction among sponsors, exhibitors and attendees. ASNP's interaction includes designated breaks when attendees are encouraged to meet with sponsors and exhibitors as well as designated tables for sponsors and exhibitors during lunch to promote extended and focused discussions.
• Knowledge of Attendees - Because ASNP conference attendees are special needs attorneys who already share a relatively high level of common professional knowledge, ASNP speakers have the freedom to expand the collective knowledge domain of attendees rather than merely reinforce existing shared knowledge.

ASNP's 2011 Speakers and Highlights

• Vincent Russo - Alternatives to Special Needs Trusts - Russo, one of ASNP's founders, highlighted planning uncertainties that justify consideration of alternative special needs strategies. In the context of such uncertainties, including life expectancies plus changes in Medicaid and estate tax laws, Russo utilized videotaped case examples to discuss several alternatives to SNTs.
• Robert Wood - Qualified Settlement Funds - Wood is a frequent speaker at structured settlement and settlement planning events. His ASNP presentation addressed single claimant QSFs and attorney fee QSFs including bad fact patterns, abusive cases and alternative definitions for "multiple claimants". Wood also discussed practical QSF issues such as the termination process, what to do with left-over assets and QSF administrative costs. Except for abusive cases, Wood believes the IRS actually likes QSFs.
• Rafael Gonzales - MSAs and Special Needs Planning - Gonzales' presentation addressed mandatory insurer reporting, conditional payments and Medicare set-aside arrangements. MSA's have become a frequent topic at almost every structured settlement and settlement planning conference - and with good reason given the many and frequent new developments. Gonzales' presentation featured summaries of the most recent case law, regulatory developments and legislative proposals.
• David Lillesand - SSI Update - Lillesand's annual Social Security Income summary for ASNP included detailed analysis of Social Security Regional Chief Counsel precedents for 2009 and 2010 some of which impact structured settlements used to fund SNTs. Lillesand also highlighted three new POMs for SNTs. Based upon his review of recent Social Security rulings, Lillesand identified a potential new issue for attorneys - expanded circumstances when legal fees are subject to Social Security approval.
• Patricia Dudek - Creative Housing Solutions - Although disabled persons historically have had few options for home ownership, home ownership is now a more realistic possibility according to Dudek. Her presentation summarized existing federal housing programs as well as financial and legal strategies for achieving home ownership for persons with disabilities.
• Cynthia Barrett - How Health Care Reform Impacts Persons with Disabilities - Barrett's discussion summarized the new Federal health care legislation and advised ASNP attendees about how to adjust their professional practice. Of special interest to structured settlement and settlement planning professionals, Barrett highlighted and discussed the questions plaintiff attorneys are most likely to ask about health care reform.
• David Foster Koth and Gregory Finn - Selecting Corporate Trustees - Among the many issues discussed during this presentation, the portion addressing structured settlement issues was among the best and most interesting. In the context of allocating trust investments among different financial vehicles, the co-presenters provided a balanced perspective on the advantages and disadvantages of structured settlements as well as the role of the secondary structured settlement market.
• Ruth Phelps - Community Funded SNTs - When a community establishes a special needs trust, several important planning considerations exist. Phelps used a case example to discuss these issues and offer a model planning solution.
• Professor Hank Greely - Diagnostic Genetic Testing - Greely, a leading expert on health law and the biosciences, summarized recent genetic testing developments including the impact of genetic testing for civil litigation (future medical costs) and insurance (age ratings).
• Michelle Ward - IRA Tax Planning - Ward provided a detailed analysis of IRA taxation focusing on distribution options and existing Federal regulations under IRC § 401(A)(9)..

Congratulations to ASNP for another outstanding educational program.

For S2KM reporting about past ASNP conferences and other settlement planning and structured settlement professional associations, see S2KM's structured settlement wiki.

Structured Settlements in 2010 - 2

Beginning in 2004, S2KM has utilized this blog ("Beyond Structured Settlements") and related web 2.0 publications to report and analyze strategic developments impacting the structured settlement and special needs settlement planning (aka settlement consulting) industries.

Featuring industry leaders, commentators and professional association conferences, S2KM has attempted to highlight how legal and technology changes are redefining the traditional (pre-2001) structured settlement market including structured settlement public policy as well as structured settlement business standards, business practices and business models.

From S2KM's perspective, the following categories, people and developments defined the structured settlement and special needs settlement planning industries in 2010:

Professional associations

• S2KM attended seven professional educational conferences during 2010 which addressed structured settlement and/or special needs settlement planning issues:
  • National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA) - 2
  • Society of Settlement Planners (SSP)
  • National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP)
  • National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP)
  • National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA)
  • Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP)
• As a general observation, all of these conferences were valuable and complementary. For S2KM's 2010 (plus historical) conference reports, see S2KM's structured settlement wiki.
• SSP, NASP and NAMSAP deserve special recognition for their 2010 strategic educational discussions featuring industry leaders, commentators and critics who offered alternative perspectives for improving and growing the structured settlement and special needs settlement planning markets.
• By comparison, NSSTA remains reluctant to openly discuss strategic industry issues or to include alternative perspectives in their educational programs. More positively, NSSTA representatives and members increasingly attend and speak at non-NSSTA structured settlement and special needs settlement planning conferences.
• NAELA's educational conferences are noteworthy because they regularly feature sections or entire programs titled "unprograms". NAELA's unprograms are moderated group discussions about specific topics. NAELA's 2010 Special Needs Summit included six separate one hour unprograms with a concluding unprogram wrap-up session. One example of a 2010 NAELA unprogram was titled "Collaboration Opportunities for Special Needs Attorneys and Financial Planners".

Industry leaders

• NSSTA promoted Eric Vaughn, who previously served as NSSTA's lobbyist, to replace Joseph Ricci as NSSTA's new Executive Director effective July 1, 2010. Peter Arnold, previously NSSTA's Marketing Director, was similarly promoted to serve as NSSTA's Associate Executive Director. NSSTA's Board of Directors elected Michael Kelly as its 2010 President and Dan Finn as its President-elect. NSSTA honored Congressman Peter Stark during its Annual Meeting as its 2010 Legislator of the Year. NSSTA also gave special recognition to Karen Meyers and Joseph Bornstein for their contributions to NSSTA's CSSC and NSSTAPAC programs respectively..
• SSP elected Jason Lazarus as its President for 2010-11 and Charles Schell as Vice President. SSP honored Richard Risk with the designation of "life member" for his contributions to SSP and the settlement planning industry. Joseph Tombs continues as Director of SSP's RSP certification program.
• NASP named Matthew Bracy as its new President succeeding Robin Shapiro. Earl Nesbitt continues as NASP's Executive Director.
• NAMSAP elected Michael Westcott as its President.
• NAELA honored Dick Traum as the first recipient of NAELA's Special Needs Leadership Award. Traum is the founder and CEO of Achilles International, a non-profit organization providing community support for athletes with disabilities with members in more than 70 countries.
• Amy Palmiero-Winters, ultra-marathoner and lower-leg amputee, was named during 2010 as the winner of the 2009 James E. Sullivan Award given annually to the top amateur athlete in the United States.

Industry commentators

• For the past several years, Robert Wood has been the preeminent tax commentator and author for the structured settlement and settlement planning industries. Wood's publications appear on the Wood & Porter website.
• During 2010, Jeremy Babener emerged as an important new structured settlement tax commentator and author specializing in public policy and proposing an expanded structured settlement tax subsidy. In addition to authoring several structured settlement articles for tax and legal journals, Babener participated as a featured speaker at both the SSP and NASP 2010 Annual Meetings and authored two blog posts for S2KM during 2010. Babener discussed his structured settlement writing (accessible on S2KM's structured settlement public policy wiki and Babener's Tax Structuring website) in this 2010 S2KM interview.
• Additional authors who wrote and published 2010 legal articles about structured settlement and special needs settlement planning issues included: Daniel Hindert, Matt Garretson, Sylvius von Saucken, Peter Wayne, Mark Popolizio, Gregg Polsky and Brant Hellwig.
• Both the Legal Broadcast Network and Ringler Radio continued to produce and distribute podcasts featuring structured settlement commentators during 2010.
• An increasing number of structured settlement and special needs settlement planning professionals published blogs during 2010 joining industry blogging pioneers such as John Darer, Mark Wahlstrom, Matthew Bracy and Jack Meligan.
• Incisive Media published two new updates (Release 47 and Release 48) for "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" during 2010.

Legislation

• Both the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Health Care Reform) and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) redesign the legal environment in which the structured settlement and personal injury settlement planning markets operate.
• Among the anticipated strategic consequences of health care reform:
  • An estimated 16 million more Medicaid participants - and therefore:
  • More special needs trusts;
  • More special needs attorneys;
  • More structured settlement annuities payable to trustees.
• Dodd-Frank re-writes federal banking law and creates a new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. A key question, as yet unanswered, is whether the sale and/or purchase of structured settlement annuities constitutes a "financial product or service" under Dodd-Frank requiring regulatory supervision by the Bureau.

Regulations

• The United States Department of Treasury held a public hearing on February 23, 2010 focused on proposed new regulations for Internal Revenue Code section 104(a)(2). The proposed regulations, if enacted, would:
  • Eliminate the requirement that damages be based on “tort or tort type rights” in order to qualify for the section 104(a)(2) tax exclusion, and
  • Incorporate 1996 legislation requiring that personal injuries and sickness damages be “physical” in order to qualify for the section 104(a)(2) tax exclusion.
  • A subsequent S2KM interview featured John McCullough and Richard Risk, two of the structured settlement industry members who spoke at the hearing.
• The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) continued to issue administrative guidance during 2010 for enforcement of the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) Act of 1980 and the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA) reporting requirements for insurers. Featured discussions during the NAMSAP 2010 Annual meeting highlighted:
  • The increasing importance and complexity of the MSP statute for all personal injury stakeholders;
  • The need for these personal injury stakeholders (and their professional associations) to cooperate politically and educationally;
  • The challenges of integrating structured settlements, including rated ages, with Medicare set-aside arrangements (MSAs) in the context of health care reform, CMS MSA regulations and related judicial rulings;
  • The evolving business models, claim management strategies and professional skill sets which are now emerging to address these challenges.

Case law

• The Spencer v. Hartford class action lawsuit which settled in 2010 represents one of the most important legal developments in the history of the structured settlement industry.
• Hartford's gross settlement payment of $72.5 million represents 4.5% of total premium dollars Hartford used to purchase structured settlement annuities for class members from January 1, 1997 to June 7, 2010.
• Among the plaintiffs allegations:
  • Hartford and its attorneys, brokers and agents violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and committed common law fraud in structuring its settlements.
  • Hartford's structured settlements were priced so Hartford retained 15% of the value of the structured settlements.
  • Hartford and its attorneys, brokers and agents misrepresented structured settlements including explicit or implicit reference to:
    • The "cost" of the annuity or structured settlement or portion of the settlement being structured; and/or
    • The "value" of the annuity or structured settlement or portion of the settlement being structured.
• Hartford, which stopped writing new structured settlement business in 2009, denied the allegations.

Technology

• Despite the accelerating technology advances revolutionizing society generally, the structured settlement and special needs settlement planning industries have been slow to study and incorporate these advances into their educational programs and business models.
• The best industry-sponsored technology education programs during 2010 were offered by Mark Miller during a NAELA webinar and Harry Margolis at the ASNP 2010 Annual Meeting. Both presentations provided introductory overviews of web 2.0 and including recommendations for integrating specific social networking tools into special needs legal practices.
• NSSTA initiated a NSSTA blog during 2010 and offered an educational program about Internet marketing during its 2010 Fall Education program.

Public policy

• Both SSP and NASP featured specific discussions and presentations about structured settlement public policy during their 2010 Annual Meetings. The discussions included industry commentators representing diverse viewpoints and priorities.
• Jeremy Babener followed his 2009 paper debunking industry myths concerning "structured settlement dissipation studies" with several 2010 articles and papers addressing structured settlement public policy issues. Babener's public policy writing is featured on S2KM's structured settlement public policy wiki.
• Release 47 of "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" re-examined several structured settlement public policy issues related to single claimant 468B funds, structured settlement factoring transactions, dissipation by personal injury victims, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, special needs trusts and Medicare set-aside arrangements.
• In a 2010 Boston College Law Review article, professors Gregg Polsky and Brant Hellwig challenged the application of any structured settlement tax benefit for deferring attorney fees or payments to non-physically injured tort plaintiffs under general common law tax principles.

Business standards and practices

• The Spencer v. Hartford case raises many issues about structured settlement business standards and practices which require greater education and analysis if the primary market expects to improve and grow. For example;
  • Is the primary structured settlement market capable of self-regulation?
  • Why shouldn't key elements of the state structured settlement protection statutes (judicial approval; best interest test; compensation disclosure) be applied to primary market transactions?
  • As an additional requirement, or as an alternative, why haven't plaintiff attorneys and plaintiff consultants insisted upon a claimant's written informed consent before entering into a structured settlement?
  • Why haven't the SSP's Standards of Professional Conduct received more public discussion and analysis within the structured settlement industry?
• "Cash now" advertising represents one of the most highly criticized secondary market business practices. Although this practice continues to exist, NASP took an important educational step during its 2010 Annual Meeting by highlighting this issue and inviting secondary market critics to participate in the discussion.

Business models

• While other segments of, and products within, the special needs settlement planning market have expanded and improved in recent years, the structured settlement primary market in general has stagnated and retrenched.
• During 2010, however, representatives of the primary structured settlement market increasingly recognized their interdependency, and interacted, with other settlement planning professionals and professional associations such as special needs attorneys, life care planners, Medicare set-aside professionals and secondary structured settlement market participants.
• Future industry improvement and growth will require even greater appreciation and identification of shared interests as well as expanded implementation of shared political strategies, educational programs and business models.

Prior S2KM annual reports about the structured settlement industry and reports about industry association conferences are available on S2KM's structured settlement wiki.

NSSTA and NASP 2010 Educational Conferences - 4

The National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP) just raised the standard for structured settlement strategic discussion and analysis during its 2010 educational conference in Las Vegas.

Previous standards: the 2008 Structured Settlement Thought Leadership Conference and NASP's 2009 Annual Meeting.

NASP 2010 strategic anlaysis participants: Earl Nesbitt (NASP Executive Director and moderator); Peter Vodola (Co-Chairman of the NSSTA Legal Committee); Matthew Bracy (President of NASP); Craig Lessner (General Counsel of Peachtree); John Darer and Patrick Hindert (NSSTA members and industry bloggers); Richard Risk (SSP member); and Jeremy Babener and Tim Morbach (industry analysts).

Strategic Questions: Nesbitt challenged the NASP panel and launched the industry discussion with these strategic structured settlement questions:

• What has caused the decline in the primary structured settlement market?
• What steps has the primary market taken to improve its product and sales?
• Is the structured settlement market transitioning to a settlement planning model?
• If yes, what impact will this transition have for the primary and secondary market?
• What issues and problems does the primary market see with the secondary market:
  • Operating and administering their current portfolio?
  • Originating new business?
  • Administrative costs?
  • Complying with transfer orders?
  • Potential liabilities?
  • Beneficiary issues?
• How can the secondary market help improve and grow the primary market?
• How can the primary market improve the secondary market?
• What are the risks of a continuing adversarial relationship between the primary and secondary markets?
• How does the primary market view the positive secondary market recovery from the 2008 financial market collapse?
• What are the primary market annuity provider concerns with the secondary markets?
• How can the secondary markets help improve and grow the primary market?
• How can the primary market improve the secondary market?
• What are the risks if the relationship between the primary and secondary markets remains adversarial?
• How did the 2008 collapse of the capital markets impact the primary structured settlement market?

This S2KM blog post continues S2KM's reporting and analysis of the NSSTA and NASP 2010 educational conferences.

NSSTA and NASP 2010 Educational Conferences -1

There are three leading structured settlement professional associations:

• NSSTA (The National Structured Settlement Trade Association)
• SSP (The Society of Settlement Planners)
• NASP (National Association of Settlement Purchasers)

And several affiliated national structured settlement stakeholder associations. These include:

• NAELA (Natonal Academy of Elder Law Attorneys)
• NAMSAP (National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals)
• AAJ - (American Association for Justice)
• ASNP - (Academy of Special Needs Planners)

Both NSSTA and NASP have announced simultaneous structured settlement educational programs in Las Vegas, Nevada for November 10-12, 2010.

This strategic coincidence provides an important opportunity for structured settlement participants, knowledge experts, stakeholders and industry analysts to evaluate and discuss the current status of the structured settlement industry.

Among other featured speakers at the NASP conference, Pat Hindert will join fellow bloggers John Darer and Matt Bracy to highlight and discuss the most important structured settlement industry issues. In addition to S2KM commentary, check John's blog and Matt's blog for further discussion and commentary.

Here is S2KM's preliminary list of the most important structured settlement industry issues:

• The Internet - whether, when and how will the structured settlement industry transition its knowledge and business models to web 2.0 technologies?
• Settlement consulting - whether, when and how will the structured settlement industry address (and hopefully embrace) a broader professional perspective to incorporate settlement consulting?
• Regulation - whether the structured settlement industry is capable of self-regulation and how best to regulate the structured settlement industry?
• Government benefits - how best to integrate structured settlements with other government benefits?
• Secondary market - how best to integrate the secondary market to improve structured settlements?
• Insolvencies - how will the structured settlement industry address the upcoming Executive Life of New York (ELNY) insolvency?
• Business standards and practices - what did the structured settlement industry learn from the Spencer v. Hartford case?

For additional S2KM reporting about structured settlement professional associations, see S2KM's structured settlement wiki.

For additional S2KM commentary about 2010 strategic structured settlement issues, see S2KM's related blog reporting.

NAMSAP 2010 Annual Meeting

The National Alliance of Medicare-Set Aside Professionals (NAMSAP) hosted its Sixth Annual Meeting and Educational Conference in Arlington, Virginia on September 30-October 1, 2010. The meeting demonstrated NAMSAP's expanding leadership role within both the special needs settlement planning and structured settlement industries.

The NAMSAP meeting also highlighted:

• The increasing importance and complexity of the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) statute for all personal injury stakeholders;
• The need for these personal injury stakeholders (and their professional associations) to cooperate politically and educationally;
• The challenges of integrating structured settlements with Medicare set-aside arrangements (MSAs) in the context of health care reform, CMS MSA regulations and related judicial rulings;
• The evolving business models, claim management strategies and professional skill sets which are now emerging to address these challenges.

According to its website, "NAMSAP is the only non-profit association exclusively addressing the issues and challenges of the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute and its impact on workers’ compensation and liability settlements". Founded in 2004, NAMSAP now has more than 500 members representing multiple professional disciplines. In additional to its annual conference, NAMSAP provides its members with other educational resources including a popular list serve and frequent webinars. NAMSAP's political priorities include its membership in the Medicare Advocacy Recovery Coalition (MARC).

The NAMSAP educational conference featured the following topics and speakers:

• Keynote speaker - Eric Vaughn, Executive Director of the National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA), proposed greater cooperation between NAMSAP and the structured settlement industry to "improve and grow" both the MSA and structured settlement markets. Vaughn urged NAMSAP members to become more active in federal lobbying and suggested strategies for achieving lobbying success.
• Professional administration panel - Rob Brown, Hany Abdelsayed, and Bob Barson set a new standard for successfully engaging audience participation as they discussed the challenges of post-settlement administrative compliance and why post-settlement compliance is important for all MSA stakeholders.
• Structured settlement panel - Patrick Hindert, Christine Phillips, Brian Fillion,and Jeffrey Swigart reviewed statutory history, CMS requirements and recommended documentation for structured settlements and MSAs. They discussed best practices, provided case examples and explained why structured settlements produce consistent cost savings in the MSA context.
• Legal update panel - Mark Popolizio, Jill Schroeder and Martin Cassavoy presented a summary analysis of several recent MSP cases including: Hadden v. United States; Haro v. Sibelius; United States v. Harris; and United States v. Stricker;
• MSA case study - Fran Provenzano developed and administered a competitive MSA case study exercise where teams of audience participants developed MSA allocations and projected future medical needs based upon medical records from an actual case. Team results were then compared with the allocations and projected costs CMS approved.
• Pharmacy panel - Dane Higgins, Matt Larkin, and Phil Walls discussed off-label use of medications and the impact of the May 14, 2010 CMS memorandum.
• Congressional panel - Congressional Assistant Laura Bozell and lobbyist Eric Rasmussen supplemented Eric Vaughn's keynote address with their own analysis of the upcoming 2010 federal elections and their recommendations for how best to lobby members of Congress and their staffs.
• Rated age discussion panel - Ismael Acevedo, Dan Durbin, John Meaney, and David Korch summarized annuity pricing and the role of rated ages in the settlement process. They highlighted problems for annuity providers and their structured settlement agents created by recent CMS rated age requirements and offered ideas for improving the rated age process for MSAs.
• MARC update - Roy Franco, co-chairman and founder of MARC, summarized MARC's 2010 accomplishments and legislative initiatives and highlighted continuing problems created by the MMSEA legislation.

Additional reasons for the success of the NAMSAP 2010 educational program were the diversity and intellectual strength of the audience and the quality and time allocated to the several exhibitors. In addition to the presenters, several leaders from both NSSTA and SSP attended the NAMSAP conference. Other attendees included defense attorneys, plaintiff attorneys, special needs attorneys, MSA attorneys, MSA administrators, MSA allocators, and rehabilitation specialists, as well as structured settlement underwriters, annuity providers and consultants.

NAMSAP announced their new officers and directors during the meeting:

• President - Michael Westcott
• Vice President - Jon Gice
• Treasurer - David Korch
• Secretary - Douglas Shaw
• Additional Directors - Barbara Bate; Ben Basista; Robert Brown; Raphael Gonzolez; Mark Popolizio; Fran Jacoby Provenzano; and Leslie Schumacher.

For S2KM reporting about prior NAMSAP conferences, see S2KM's structured settlement wiki.

For Patrick Hindert's NAMSAP structured settlement power point, see the TSSG website.

NAELA's Special Needs Summit - 2

This S2KM blog post strategically analyzes the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA) 2010 Special Needs Summit from a structured settlement perspective. A prior S2KM post summarized the NAELA Special Needs Summit. A subsequent S2KM post will strategically analyze the NAELA Special Needs Summit from the perspective of Internet-based knowledge management.

For related S2KM learning resources, see S2KM's public read-only wikis:

• Structured settlement
• Structured settlement public policy
• Web 2.0 for lawyers

From a structured settlement perspective, the strategic business overlap with special needs attorneys encompasses disabled personal injury victims, their families and trial attorneys. Various knowledge leaders, knowledge networks and communities of practice within this strategic business and public domain utilize alternative terminology to describe their businesses without comparative analysis of the terminology itself. Here are some recommended resources to help special needs attorneys understand this growing legal market segment:

• Settlement law - hardcopy textbooks:
  • Robert W. Wood
    • "Taxation of Damage Awards and Settlement Payments"
    • "Qualified Settlement Funds and 468B"
  • Matt Garretson: "Negotiating and Settling Tort Cases"
  • Stuart Zimring, Rebecca Morgan and Bradley Frigon: "Fundamentals of Special Needs Trusts"
• Structured settlement law - Daniel Hindert, Joseph Dehner and Patrick Hindert: "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments"
• Settlement consulting - see S2KM's report and analysis of Joseph DiGangi's presentation at the 2009 NSSTA winter meeting.
• Settlement planning - see S2KM's report about the SSP 2009 conference.
• Special needs settlement planning - see S2KM's report about the ASNP 2009 conference and Tim Nay interview.

S2KM regularly attends and publishes reports summarizing and analyzing national educational conferences sponsored by selected professional associations and universities whose speakers and attendees participate within the strategic business overlap of structured settlements and special needs law:

• National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA)
• Society of Settlement Planners (SSP)
• National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP)
• American Association for Justice (AAJ)
• National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA)
• Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP)
• National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP)
• Stetson Law School - Special Needs Trust conference

Strategic question: from a structured settlement perspective, what was most important about NAELA's first-ever Special Needs Summit? 

Strategic answer: None of the NAELA speakers or unprograms:

• Attempted to define "special needs law" or any of its ancillary legal and business domains.
• Addressed any of the following structured settlement legal priorities and developments - all of which are strategically important for special needs attorneys:
  • IRC sections 104(a), 130, 468B or 5891;
  • Treasury Hearings for IRC 104(a)(2) regulations
  • Treasury 2009-10 Priority Guidance Plan - dropping single claimant 468B.
  • Spencer v. Hartford class action lawsuit - alleging civil RICO violations.
  • Unauthorized practice of law
  • Dissipation studies
  • Single claimant 468B funds
  • Executive Life of New York
  • Secondary structured settlement annuity market:
    • State structured settlement protection statutes.
    • J.G. Wentworth bankruptcy
    • Fresno County factoring cases
    • Rapid Settlements arbitration model
    • California protection statute amendments - including "best interest" definition

Why should special needs attorneys be interested in structured settlement law? This S2KM structured settlement diagram summarizes a complex legal and financial transaction that requires special needs legal knowledge, documentation and representation and also presents business and career opportunities for special needs attorneys:

• IRC 468B qualified settlement funds
• IRC 130 qualified and non-qualified assignments
• Special needs trusts
• Medicare set-aside arrangements
• Structured settlement transfers

Additional S2KM structured settlement resources for special needs attorneys interested in learning more about structured settlement law:

• Market surveys
• Growing the market
• Structured settlements in 2009
• structured settlement wiki
• structured settlement public policy wiki.

S2KM's next blog post will analyze NAELA's Special Needs Summit from an Internet-based knowledge management perspective.

NAELA's Special Needs Summit - 1

More than 25 years following its formation, the 5,000 member National Association of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA) hosted its first-ever "Special Needs Summit" in New Orleans February 25-27, 2010 acknowledging what many NAELA members have understood for years - special needs law is a separate and fast-growing ancillary component and legal domain strategically related to elder law.

The highlight of NAELA's first Special Needs Summit was NAELA's awarding and honoring Dick Traum as the first recipient of NAELA's Special Needs Leadership Award. Traum is the founder and CEO of Achilles International, a non-profit organization providing community support for athletes with disabilities. Achilles International, with members in more than 70 countries, has recently developed specialized running programs for disabled children and wounded war veterans.

The educational component of NAELA's first Special Needs Summit featured NAELA's extensive knowledge resources and positive knowledge sharing culture. NAELA's educational program complemented, expanded and updated recent annual conferences presented by the Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP), the National Association of Medicare Set-aside Professionals (NAMSAP) and Stetson Law School as previously reported by S2KM.

NAELA's educational conferences regularly feature sections or entire programs titled "unprograms". NAELA's unprograms are moderated group discussions about specific topics. NAELA's Special Needs Summit included six separate one hour unprograms with a concluding unprogram wrap-up session. One example of an unprogram in New Orleans was titled "Collaboration Opportunities for Special Needs Attorneys and Financial Planners".

Other topics discussed at NAELA's Special Needs Summit:

• Special needs public policy and legislative issues
• Communicating with the disability community
• Pooled trusts
• Social security applications
• Medicare secondary payer compliance
• National project for state reviews of special needs trusts
• Veterans benefits
• Special needs law case update
• Emergency preparedness
• Independent community housing
• Divorce of parents with a special needs child
• Special education law
• Self-settled third party special needs trusts
• Fair Housing Act
• Serving on a non-profit Board of Directors

Congratulations to NAELA's Special Needs Summit Co-chairs: Joan Lensky Robert, Stephen Dale and Howard Krooks, and NAELA's Program Director, Casey Anderson, for organizing an historic and educational special needs conference.

In a subsequent blog post, S2KM will publish its analysis of the NAELA Special Needs Summit utilizing two strategic perspectives: structured settlement and Internet-based knowledge management.

For prior S2KM reporting about NAELA conferences, see S2KM's structured settlement and web 2.0 for lawyers wikis.

Tim Nay Interview

Tim Nay, a partner in the law offices of Nay & Friedenberg, is one of the leading special needs and elder law attorneys in the United States. As an adjunct to his legal career, Nay was also educated as a clinical social worker and practiced in that profession for many years.

Among his professional contributions, Nay is the founding President and a Fellow of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA) and continues to participate on NAELA committees, task forces and educational programs. Nay is a Director of the Society of Settlement Planners (SSP) as well as a founding member, former Director and officer of the National Association of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP). Nay is a member of the Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP) and serves on ASNP's Advisory Board.

On the state level, Nay is a member of the Oregon and Washington Bar Associations. He is a past President of the Oregon Gerontological Association, past Chairman and founding member of the Elder Law Section of the Oregon State Bar and past President of the Oregon Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association.

Earlier this month, at the ASNP 2009 Annual Meeting, Nay participated as Chairman and presenter for the ASNP educational program titled "Special Needs Settlement Planning" (SNSP) following which he provided S2KM with this exclusive interview.

S2KM: Greetings, Tim. In addition to your legal practice, how do you find time for, and what motivates, your many professional association activities?

Nay: Planning educational conferences has evolved into a small passion of my practice. My role as CEO of Nay & Friendberg, as well as our practice model, allows me to commit time to plan and present at conferences related to our practice. I always learn something.

S2KM: What do you consider your most important professional accomplishments?

Nay: Helping people and touching lives positively have been the most rewarding aspects of my career. When a client sends a handwritten "thank you" note to me or a member of our team, it means a lot. I am proud of my educational accomplishments including graduate degrees in counseling psychology and clinical social work prior to law school. My professional association work is a continuing source of many friendships and shared accomplishments.

S2KM: What connections do you see among elder law, special needs law and settlement planning?

Nay: Elder law practitioners champion special needs trusts, initially in the context of estate planning. Bringing special needs trusts to settlement planning is a logical extension of what elder law attorneys have been doing for more than 20 years. To contribute to the settlement process at the highest level, however, special needs attorneys must understand, or at least be aware of, other substantive legal issues important to the settlement process.

S2KM: How do you define "special needs settlement planning"?

Nay: Our firm views settlement planning as a process. We use a team approach which I supervise. Sandy Conley, senior legal assistant in our probate department, coordinates our special needs planning cases. She also drafts the settlement documents and papers in the state court proceedings to establish any guardianship and/or conservatorship. Jackie Appleton, senior legal assistant in our Legal/Financial department, is a third party special needs expert. Whenever third party planning is appropriate for the family of an injury victim, she drafts the documents and supervises their execution. Other members of our probate and estate planning staffs frequently assist our settlement planning process. Whenever difficult legal issues appear in settlement planning cases, we triage the case with our attorney staff as well as Sandy and Jackie.

S2KM: In addition to special needs trusts and estate planning, what potential roles exist in settlement planning for special needs attorneys?

Nay: Some special needs attorneys also serve as judges; mediators; trustees; conservators; and guardians for minors or incapacitated adults. All of these roles help prepare special needs attorneys to best serve injury victims and their families.

S2KM: In your experience, what impact do 468B Qualified Settlement Funds (QSFs) have on settlement planning?

Nay: Use of 468B QSF trusts allow defendants to conclude their settlement liabilities and responsibilities so other planning priorities such as liens, allocations, government benefits and funding options can be addressed by plaintiffs and their advisors in a less-adversarial context.

S2KM: What do you like and dislike about structured settlements and structured settlement consultants?

Nay: I like the product. In most of our catastrophic injury cases, structured settlement annuities are part of the settlement package. What many special needs attorneys, including myself, do not like are the business practices of some structured settlement consultants: over-structuring; single product focus; limited product comparisons.

S2KM: Did the ASNP "special needs settlement planning" conference accomplish your objectives?

Nay: The feedback from attendees has been outstanding. Everyone came away with important new learning.

S2KM: What additional actions are needed to improve and grow the "special needs settlement planning" market?

Nay: For the "special needs settlement planning" market to grow, all stakeholders must know when a special needs trust can improve life quality for the injured party. These stakeholders include plaintiff and defense attorneys, judges, mediators, and structured settlement consultants, as well as injury victims and their families. Without that knowledge, the settlement will be gone quickly, leaving the injury victim in grinding poverty.

S2KM: Thank you, Tim, for this interview. Congratulations for your continuing professional contributions and accomplishments.

Settlement Consulting - 3

In prior posts about settlement consulting, S2KM:

• Reviewed Joseph DiGangi's discussion at the NSSTA 2009 Winter Meeting titled: "Comprehensive Settlement Consulting in the 21st Century". See: "Settlement Consulting".
• Continued DiGangi's discussion by asking questions and offering comments about "settlement consulting" definitions and scope. See: "Settlement Consulting - 2".

This S2KM post outlines settlement consulting history - from a structured settlement perspective.

S2KM's structured settlement history diagram (developed with graphic artist Keith Burtoft) concludes with the founding of the National Association of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP) in 2005.

Beginning in 2005, S2KM has continued to monitor structured settlement history by attending and reporting about settlement consulting conferences addressing structured settlements.

For the past three years, S2KM has also published annual reports about structured settlement developments:

• Structured Settlements in 2008;
  
• Structured Settlements in 2007;
• Structured Settlements in 2006.

Using the same categories as S2KM's structured settlement history diagram, here are some of the more recent settlement consulting highlights:

Social Security

• Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA);
• The Ahlborn Case (2006) - see John Campbell's analysis of the Eighth Circuit's decision which the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed.
• Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (MMSEA);
• Additional MSA rules for structured settlements (2008);
• New POMS for Special Needs Trusts (2009) - see David Lillesand's report;

Taxation - see related articles on the Wood & Porter website:

• Banks and Banaitis cases (2005) - attorney fees;
• Murphy case (2007);
• IRS Letter Ruling 200836019 (2008) - Non-qualified 130 assignments and attorney fees.

State Legislation (2005-2008) - see Release 45 of "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" (S2P2J).

• Structured settlement protection statutes;
• Uniform Trust Code;
• UCC Article 9 anti-assignment provisions;
• Medicaid annuity rules.

Other Developments

• Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP) founded (2007);
• AIG receives $150 billion U.S. Government bailout (2008);
• Joseph Ricci replaces Randy Dyer as NSSTA Executive Director (2008);
• SSP publishes its "Standards of Professional Conduct" (2008) and begins its Registered Settlement Planner (RSP) certification (2008);
• American Association of Nurse Life Care Planners (AANLCP) founded (2008);
• Several annuity providers depart the structured settlement market (2005-2008);
• Structured settlement annuity premium remains level at $6 billion per year (2001-2008);
  
• Structured settlement surveys identify a larger market (2006-2008);
• Settlement consulting bloggers and podcast providers emerge (2004-2009).

For reasons why S2KM views 1982, 2001 and 2008 as strategically important for structured settlements, see "Structured Settlements in 2008 - 1".