Beyond Structured Settlements

ASNP 2011 Annual Meeting

The Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP) hosted its Fifth Annual Conference March 11-12, 2011 in San Francisco. Co-chaired by Kevin Urbatsch and Michael Gilfix, the 2011 ASNP conference highlighted a growing knowledge gap between traditional structured settlement consultants (many of whom aspire to be settlement planners) and special needs attorneys (whose professional focus increasing includes settlement planning).

ASNP is one of three national associations of attorneys, the others being the Special Needs Alliance (SNA) and the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA), whose members engage in special needs planning. The primary difference between special needs planning and settlement planning is that special needs planning includes clients whose disabilities result from many causes including but not limited to personal injury or workers compensation accidents.

Beyond the quality of speakers and value of topics, ASNP conferences provide exceptional educational experiences for three additional reasons:

• Handout materials - Whereas most speakers at structured settlement conferences provide attendees with a power point handout or no written handout, most ASNP speakers provide attendees with original, topic-specific professional papers (in addition to outlines and/or power points) captured on a digital thumb drive.
• Sponsors and Exhibitors - Among the several national conferences S2KM attends, ASNP and NAMSAP provide the best interaction among sponsors, exhibitors and attendees. ASNP's interaction includes designated breaks when attendees are encouraged to meet with sponsors and exhibitors as well as designated tables for sponsors and exhibitors during lunch to promote extended and focused discussions.
• Knowledge of Attendees - Because ASNP conference attendees are special needs attorneys who already share a relatively high level of common professional knowledge, ASNP speakers have the freedom to expand the collective knowledge domain of attendees rather than merely reinforce existing shared knowledge.

ASNP's 2011 Speakers and Highlights

• Vincent Russo - Alternatives to Special Needs Trusts - Russo, one of ASNP's founders, highlighted planning uncertainties that justify consideration of alternative special needs strategies. In the context of such uncertainties, including life expectancies plus changes in Medicaid and estate tax laws, Russo utilized videotaped case examples to discuss several alternatives to SNTs.
• Robert Wood - Qualified Settlement Funds - Wood is a frequent speaker at structured settlement and settlement planning events. His ASNP presentation addressed single claimant QSFs and attorney fee QSFs including bad fact patterns, abusive cases and alternative definitions for "multiple claimants". Wood also discussed practical QSF issues such as the termination process, what to do with left-over assets and QSF administrative costs. Except for abusive cases, Wood believes the IRS actually likes QSFs.
• Rafael Gonzales - MSAs and Special Needs Planning - Gonzales' presentation addressed mandatory insurer reporting, conditional payments and Medicare set-aside arrangements. MSA's have become a frequent topic at almost every structured settlement and settlement planning conference - and with good reason given the many and frequent new developments. Gonzales' presentation featured summaries of the most recent case law, regulatory developments and legislative proposals.
• David Lillesand - SSI Update - Lillesand's annual Social Security Income summary for ASNP included detailed analysis of Social Security Regional Chief Counsel precedents for 2009 and 2010 some of which impact structured settlements used to fund SNTs. Lillesand also highlighted three new POMs for SNTs. Based upon his review of recent Social Security rulings, Lillesand identified a potential new issue for attorneys - expanded circumstances when legal fees are subject to Social Security approval.
• Patricia Dudek - Creative Housing Solutions - Although disabled persons historically have had few options for home ownership, home ownership is now a more realistic possibility according to Dudek. Her presentation summarized existing federal housing programs as well as financial and legal strategies for achieving home ownership for persons with disabilities.
• Cynthia Barrett - How Health Care Reform Impacts Persons with Disabilities - Barrett's discussion summarized the new Federal health care legislation and advised ASNP attendees about how to adjust their professional practice. Of special interest to structured settlement and settlement planning professionals, Barrett highlighted and discussed the questions plaintiff attorneys are most likely to ask about health care reform.
• David Foster Koth and Gregory Finn - Selecting Corporate Trustees - Among the many issues discussed during this presentation, the portion addressing structured settlement issues was among the best and most interesting. In the context of allocating trust investments among different financial vehicles, the co-presenters provided a balanced perspective on the advantages and disadvantages of structured settlements as well as the role of the secondary structured settlement market.
• Ruth Phelps - Community Funded SNTs - When a community establishes a special needs trust, several important planning considerations exist. Phelps used a case example to discuss these issues and offer a model planning solution.
• Professor Hank Greely - Diagnostic Genetic Testing - Greely, a leading expert on health law and the biosciences, summarized recent genetic testing developments including the impact of genetic testing for civil litigation (future medical costs) and insurance (age ratings).
• Michelle Ward - IRA Tax Planning - Ward provided a detailed analysis of IRA taxation focusing on distribution options and existing Federal regulations under IRC § 401(A)(9)..

Congratulations to ASNP for another outstanding educational program.

For S2KM reporting about past ASNP conferences and other settlement planning and structured settlement professional associations, see S2KM's structured settlement wiki.

NAELA Special Needs Summit - 3

This S2KM blog post strategically analyzes the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA) 2010 Special Needs Summit from an Internet-based knowledge management (KM) perspective. The NAELA Special Needs Summit occurred February 25-27 in New Orleans. Prior S2KM blog posts summarized the NAELA Special Needs Summit and analyzed the NAELA Special Needs Summit from a structured settlement perspective.

This S2KM review also considers a March 9, 2010 Web 2.0 webinar for NAELA members by Mark Miller titled "Web 2.0: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly". Miller is Chief Operating Officer of ElderLawAnswers; General Manager of Lawyers Life Network; and Director of Operations and Business Development for the Academy of Special Needs Planners. Miller has more than 15 years experience in sales and business development for web-based service providers.

Positives

• Knowledge resources - Whether the subject is elder law, special needs law or personal injury settlement law, NAELA's membership possesses substantial knowledge resources. Specific to disabled persons, NAELA's knowledge encompasses technical legal knowledge as well as relationship knowledge with disability leaders and disability community stakeholders.
• Knowledge culture - NAELA promotes and prioritizes legal scholarship. Examples include: the NAELA Journal and NAELA's annual writing prize for law students. NAELA promotes and practices knowledge sharing. NAELA's unprograms offer a non-hierarchical and interactive learning alternative to traditional lectures. Compared with traditional lectures, NAELA's unprogram learning model is more comparable with how collaborative learning occurs on the Internet.
• Focus on web 2.0 - NAELA has identified and offered learning resources on web 2.0 and social network technologies. In addition to Mark Miller's March 9, 2010 web 2.0 presentation, NAELA also featured S2KM's web 2.0 for lawyers wiki at its 2008 National Symposium.
• Mark Miller's web 2.0 presentation - Miller's 90 minute web 2.0 presentation was comprehensive. It highlighted many web 2.0 features, tools, and developments and offered advice for NAELA members about blogging; podcasting; web-site design; search engine optimization; news feeds; key word searches; social media; and emerging tools.
• Web 2.0 examples - a growing number of NAELA members, and non-NAELA special needs attorneys, have experimented with web 2.0 tools - especially blogs and podcasts. Examples of special needs and elder law blogs:
  • Harry Margolis
  • David Lillesand
  • Frank Johns
  • Patricia Kefalas
  • John Campbell

Negatives

• Web 2.0 learning disconnect
  • Neither the NAELA Special Needs Summit nor Miller's web 2.0 webinar made any attempt to integrate the web 2.0 medium itself into their learning programs.
  • If "the medium is the message" (to quote Marshall McLuhan), NAELA has not yet processed or responded to that message from a web 2.0 learning perspective.
  • NAELA's conference was typical of almost all professional association education conferences. Learning takes place in multi-purpose hotel meeting rooms with no Internet resources or integration. Laptops are discouraged by the general failure to provide power outlets. With the notable exception of NAELA's unprograms, the speakers lecture with limited audience interaction. Supplemental learning resources include power points, hardcopy handouts or web 1.0 flash disks.
  • Miller's web 2.0 webinar utilized a traditional web 1.0 powerpoint. His extensive presentation was lecture format with limited interactivity and no asynchronous features.
  • Typical of most introductions to the Internet, Miller's web 2.0 webinar focused primarily on identity and marketing - with no discussion about whether and how web 2.0 can enhance and accelerate learning or what learning issues and strategies occur with web 2.0.
  • As one example of a web 2.0 learning issue, many college professors (the paragons of old school learning) are banning laptops from their classroom and view in-class Internet surfing as a distraction. These paragons, however, typically lack any ability to integrate discussions (example: Socratic teaching) or Internet resources into their classroom experience. Their teaching model is a hierarchical lecture which is contrary to how the web 2.0 Internet functions.
  • Teaching web 2.0 using web 1.0 (or predecessor technologies) is akin to trying to teach people to swim or play basketball in a traditional classroom - using hardcopy text with no diagrams - instead of utilizing a swimming pool or a basketball court. After an hour or a semester in the classroom, the students still won't be able to swim or play basketball.
• Role of knowledge management
  • NAELA's members all qualify as knowledge workers. Without specifically studying knowledge management, NAELA has spent 25 years helping its members identify, expand and manage knowledge.
  • The changing Internet medium (currently web 2.0 featuring social network technologies) prioritizes knowledge and how you manage knowledge:
    • Knowledge generally becomes more transferrable and complex.
    • New knowledge tools, systems, networks, teams and leaders emerge.
    • New business models evolve requiring online skill sets and related knowledge services.
  • Unless NAELA and its members study and understand Internet-based knowledge management, how will they successfully transfer their professional knowledge (including relationship knowledge) to web 2.0?
  • And what happens to those professionals and professional associations who are slow (or unable) to successfully transfer their knowledge to the Internet? How will they compete? Who will want (or allow) them to participate on Internet-based knowledge teams and networks?
  • Neither Miller's web 2.0 webinar nor NAELA's first-ever Special Needs Summit discussed knowledge management.
  • How could knowledge management have improved the NAELA Special Needs Summit? As one example, the NAELA Summit made no attempt to define special needs law or to differentiate special needs law from elder law or personal injury settlement law. NAELA could have used (and still could use) various types of knowledge maps to:
    • Define these strategically important knowledge domains and related knowledge boundaries;
    • Identify stakeholders and online learning resources within each community of practice;
    • Highlight transactional events and transferable knowledge opportunities for NAELA members within each knowledge domain.

Unsolicited Recommendations for NAELA

• Continue to study Internet-based knowledge management - focusing on web 2.0 and social network technologies.
• Develop a web 2.0 learning strategy:
  • Utilizing appropriate learning environments, teachers and tools.
  • Introducing participants to online culture, organizational theory and functional skill sets through actual experience.
  • Integrating web 2.0 learning into NAELA's other educational programs.

For Additional Information see:

• Denham Grey's KM wiki
• S2KM prior blog posts
  • Web 2.0 for Lawyers Concept Map - featuring Barbara Bowen
  • Knowledge Management and Structured Settlements

Web 2.0 Update

S2KM's blog encourages collaborative thinking and commentary about the impact of the Internet on four overlapping markets:

• Structured settlements;
• Personal injury settlement planning;
• Special needs planning; and
• The secondary insurance markets.

S2KM's coverage includes information and observations about industry leaders and trade associations as they transition to the Internet - especially their use of web 2.0 tools to communicate, learn and collaborate.

Several notable web 2.0 developments have occurred in 2008 within the vertical markets and topics S2KM follows.

Special Needs Blogs - From a web 2.0 perspective, S2KM views elder law and special needs attorneys as advanced knowledge workers using outdated tools. Their traditional knowledge training (examples: law schools; CELA); values (example: sharing knowledge) and tools (examples: hardcopy textbooks; F2F conferences; digital publishing; listservs) are strong and positive for web 2.0.  To date, however, these lawyers and their associations have created almost no web 2.0 imprint or impact. Transition indicators exist - especially web 2.0 conference discussions and industry leaders emerging as bloggers.  The special needs bloggers are important for several markets because they address issues and laws for disabled persons. S2KM subscribes to four special needs legal blogs (as of July 7, 2008) each of which is new and/or revised in 2008:

• David Lillesand - Lillesand was a featured speaker at the SSP and ASNP 2008 Annual Meetings where he addressed structured settlement Medicaid issues. Recent Lillesand blog posts:
  • New POMS for special needs trusts - Atlanta
  • Relationship of SSDI, SSI, Medicare and Medicaid
  • How SSA decides and processes a disability claim
  • Lillesand's ASNP presentation
  • Special needs trust Q and A booklet
• Patti Dudek - Dudek is member and frequent speaker at NAELA and ASNP. Dudek participates in NAELA's member-only listserv. From a web 2.0 perspective, a listserv is a good tool to pre-launch and link wikis, blogs, podcasts and concept maps. Recent Dudek blog posts:
  • The Case for Inclusion 2008 community rankings
  • Proposed changes to the Social Security appeals process
  • The ADA Amendments Act
  • Long-term care case
• Diedre Wachbrit - With Harry Margolis and Vincent Russo, Wachbrit is a founder of, and featured speaker at, the Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP). Recent Wachbrit blog posts:
  • New special needs treatise
  • Government services harder to get
  • Autism studies
  • MetLife survey - assisted living costs

• Frank Johns (added July 7, 2008) - Johns is a leading writer and speaker about elder law, special needs and settlement planning issues. Johns also serves as the current editor of the NAELA Journal.  Recent Johns' blog posts:
  • Freedom and independence with a twist
  • New Medicaid restrictions
  • Divorce among the elderly
  • Four core values

• John Campbell (added July 14, 2008) - John Campbell, a leading special needs attorney who writes about structured settlement and settlement planning issues, has published a new blog.    John has also added valuable commentary to other blogs.  See, for example, John's comments about S2KM's January 16, 2008 blog post titled "Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007". Congratulations and good luck to John and other special needs bloggers.

LBN Developments

• The Legal Broadcast Network (LBN) has introduced Tim Butler as its new CEO and announced a successful LBN venture capital funding.
• According to LBN Chairman Mark Wahlstrom: "You are going to see a major expansion in our shows, channels, commentators and offerings, not the least of which is going to be a substantial build out of The Settlement Channel and it's content and sponsors".
• Wahlstrom also announced LBN's formation of Speaking of Settlements, which Wahlstrom characterizes as "a complete professional network in which any settlement professional, lawyer or legal professional can fill out a profile for free, start a blog, post video or audio content or create discussion boards and rooms".

Luis Suarez' Article

• Luis Suarez, a Knowledge Management (KM) consultant in the IBM Global Business Services division, is a leading KM blogger and commentator. In 2006, S2KM reported on Suarez'  visit to Cincinnati and the resulting KM discussions with Denham Grey.
• Earlier this week, a Suarez article, titled "I Freed Myself from Email's Grip", was featured in the New York Times.
• Suarez' blog provides commentary and links to the article.
  • Suarez' conclusion: "As a communication tool e-mail can be a good thing; however, as a collaboration tool it lacks some of the most significant elements from any kind of collaboration: openness, transparency, taking responsibility & ownership, co-authorship, co-llaborate ..." (Suarez' emphasis).
  • Suarez' alternative: Instead of individual email responses, Suarez has substituted instant messages, blogs, wikis - and telephones including skype.

S2KM 2008 Wikis - S2KM recommends wikis (public and private) as powerful, simple and inexpensive web 2.0 tools for Internet-based knowledge workers. S2KM has continued to publish and update public wikis during 2008 including:

• Web 2.0 for Lawyers - S2KM's Web 2.0 for Lawyers Wiki was updated for the 2008 NAELA Symposium - and featured in a 2008 LBN podcast interview with Scott Drake.
• Structured Settlement - S2KM published the Structured Settlement Wiki on March 24, 2008. 

Selected S2KM blog posts (2004-2008) about other KM and web 2.0 topics:

• KM and Law
• Legal Blogs and Taxonomies
• Web 2.0 for Lawyers
• Web 2.0 for Lawyers Concept Map
• KM and Structured Settlements
• Concept Maps
• Social Networks
• Introduction to Podcasting