Beyond Structured Settlements

Structured Settlements in 2007

Happy holidays from S2KM Limited. Thank you for reading S2KM's blog during 2007. This final 2007 S2KM blog post highlights some of this year's important structured settlement developments and issues.  For additional background information, see:

• S2KM Mid-2007 Structured Settlement Report
• Structured Settlements in 2006

Industry Growth and Development

• Industry insiders are predicting final 2007 structured settlement annuity sales (qualified and non-qualified) will match or slightly exceed total 2006 production of $6.1 billion.
• Membership growth in 2007 for the National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA) and the Society of Settlement Planners (SSP), the primary structured settlement trade associations, also appears flat. Neither of these associations has articulated a strategy for growing the structured settlement industry.
• NSSTA replaced long-time Executive Director Randy Dyer in 2007 with association management company Smith Bucklin. NSSTA has announced it will continue a business relationship with Dyer. However, NSSTA has not yet announced Dyer's new role or responsibilities.
• Annuity provider Mass Mutual exited the structured settlement industry in 2007 joining other recent industry departures such as Genworth, Travelers and Aegon. No new annuity providers entered the structured settlement market in 2007.
• The secondary life and annuity markets continued to be controversial within the structured settlement industry in 2007. Semetra resigned from NSSTA in 2007 based in part on their disagreement with NSSTA's Bylaw Amendments related to structured settlement factoring. Neither NSSTA nor SSP allows factoring companies to join their associations.
• Although the secondary structured settlement market continues to grow in 2007, the overall pace of its growth appears to have leveled off for many, but not all, participants.
• Preliminary strategic recognition and some consolidation continued during 2007 within these overlapping markets:
  
  • Structured settlements;
  • Personal injury settlement planning;
  • Litigation funding;
  • Special needs planning;
  • Secondary insurance and annuity markets.

Legislation and Regulations    

• New York Governor Eliot Spitzer announced a $750 million "agreement in principle" for Executive Life of New York in 2007. The agreement is designed to continue paying all ELNY annuitants 100% of their benefits. The announcement represents a public relations victory for the structured settlement industry. Many questions about the agreement, however, remain unanswered. For example: the amount of contributions from indemnity (casualty) insurers who own or have assigned structured settlement annuities.
• State Medicaid Agencies are continuing to adopt annuity provisions from the Deficit Reduction Act into their state Medicaid Plans. Interpretations and applications of these new annuity rules remain inconsistent creating process bottlenecks and denials. The impact of the secondary annuity markets on Medicaid qualification remains unclear in 2007. The Social Security Administration (SSA) announced in 2007 that it will draft POMS for annuities in 2008. For additional information about the Deficit Reduction Act, see:
  • Release 41 of "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments";
  • Inconvenient Questions; and
  • NAELA Annuity Policy White Paper.
• 48 states have enacted structured settlement protection statutes. Overall, these statutes appear to be accomplishing their purposes and functioning with increasing certainty and efficiency. Pennsylvania's judiciary adopted Pennsyvania Rule 229.2 in 2007 tightening some rules and processes within that state's protection statute.
• The U.S. Treasury has not ruled on single claimant 468B funds in 2007.

Case Law - some of the significant 2007 cases:    

• DOJ Sovereign Immunity Defense - see "Drinker Biddle's Structured Settlement Update" for analysis of two DOJ sovereign immunity cases: Transamerica v. Settlement Capital and Continental Casualty v. United States.
• Primary Market Disclosure Case - "Pullman & Comley's Structured Settlement Insights" provided the first Internet analysis of Joseph v. The City of New York which Pullman & Comley characterizes as ""the first court opinion to analyze the requirements in structured settlement protection acts that disclosures be made when negotiating a structured settlement."
• Rapid Settlements cases challenging secondary market laws and business practices including:
  
  • Rapid v. Symetra; and
  • CNA v. Rapid Settlements

• Murphy v. IRS - Eleven months after ruling that taxing damage awards for nonphysical compensatory damages violated the United States Constitution, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has reversed itself in Murphy v. IRS by holding that the United States can tax awards for emotional distress and injury to reputation.
• Macomber v. Travelers - the parties agreed to a confidential settlement in 2007.  It is unclear what legal precedents, if any, the earlier Connecticut State Supreme Court rulings in this case will hold for current or future structured settlement litigation.
  

Educational Programs and Resources

• Both NSSTA and SSP offered certification programs in 2007.    
• S2KM attended educational programs for the following trade associations in 2007 and wrote blog posts (see links) evaluating their structured settlement educational programs:          
  
  • National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA).          
  • Society of Settlement Planners (SSP)          
  • American Association for Justice (AAJ)          
  • National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA)          
  • Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP)          
  • National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP)    
• The structured settlement industry continued to offer various additional educational resources in 2007:          
  
  • Blogs, podcasts, wikis and concept maps;          
    
  • Digital and hardcopy newsletters;          
    
  • Hardcopy legal textbooks.

Business Standards and Practices

• 2007 developments
  
  • Broker Relations Initiative - status report provided in this S2KM blog post.
  • SSP Ethics Project - status report provided in this S2KM blog post.
• 2007 issues:
  
  • Structured settlement public policy
  • Claim management vs. settlement planning
  • Consumer and investor protection including:
    
    • Compensation disclosure;
    • Informed consent;
    • Single claimant 468B funds;
    • Unfair claim practice legislation;
    • Fiduciary responsibilities for professional advisors.

• Additional compensation issues:
  • Rebating
  • Affinity programs
  • Secondary market transactions
• Unauthorized practice of law.

Secondary Life and Annuity Markets - 1

Recent developments related to the secondary life insurance and annuity markets should encourage several professional associations to learn more about these markets - and to provide improved education in 2008 for their members about these markets.

Responsible professional associations include:

• The National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA)
• The Society of Settlement Planners (SSP)
• The National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA)
• The American Association for Justice (AAJ)
• The Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP)
• The Special Needs Alliance (SNA)

Recent secondary market developments include:

• Mealey's Conference: "Life Insurance in the Secondary Market" - Mealey's in-person conference, developed in collaboration with Drinker Biddle, is occuring December 11-12, 2007 at the Harvard Club of New York City.
• Deal Flow Media (DFM) - DFM, a publisher and educator focusing on specialty financial markets including life settlements, has announced it will enter the structured settlement market in 2008.
• A.M. Best - A.M. Best recently introduced "Best's Structured Finance Center", a web portal for the insurance-linked securities market.
• NCOIL - The National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) adopted a Model Life Settlements Act at its most recent meeting.
  

For additional information about life settlements, see:

• Wikipedia's "life settlement" entry
  
• New York Insurance Department's "Life Settlements: Top Ten Questions".
• Deal Flow Media's "The Life Settlements Report"

For additional and related S2KM commentary, see:

• Structured Settlement Secondary Market
  • Structured Settlement Transfers
  • Settlement Transfer Update
  • Settlement Transfers - Release 39
  • How the Primary Market Views Factoring
  • NSSTA Bylaw Amendments
  • J.G. Wentworth v. Peachtree Settlement Funding
  • Settlement Transfers: Wentworth and Symetra
  • Rapid v. Symetra
  • Review of Robert Wood's article: "Structured Settlements: Factor vs.Commute".
  • See also: Chapter 16 in hardcopy "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" written by Daniel Hindert, Joseph Dehner and Patrick Hindert.
• National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP)
  
  • 2007 Annual Meeting
  • 2006 Annual Meeting
  • NASP Wiki
• Deal Flow Media
  • Deal Flow Media structured settlement webinar
• Drinker Biddle
  • Drinker Biddle's "Structured Settlement Update"

2007 Advanced Elder Law Institute

The National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA) hosted its 2007 Advanced Elder Law Institute November 2-4 at The Peabody Hotel in Memphis, Tennessee under the leadership of NAELA's 2007 President Mark Shalloway and NAELA's 2007 Institute Chair Christine A. Alsop.

Titled "Elder Law and Advocacy: It's Now or Never", the NAELA conference featured 24 outstanding and diverse presentations. In addition to 275 NAELA members, 23 law students attended. NAELA's 2007 law school writing competition attracted 26 submissions.

Highlights from the Advanced Elder Law Institute:

• The 24 presentations included four breakout sessions offering multiple program options plus extensive supporting written materials.
• Tim Nay and Stephen Dale were honored as recipients of NAELA's 2007 Powley Award and Gelardi UnAward respectively.
• Mariam Piven Cotler, a bioethicist, presented the 2007 Clifton Kruse, Jr. Professionalism and Ethics Luncheon address.
• 21 exhibitors confirmed a growing awareness that NAELA's 4700 members represent an important market for many product and service providers.
• NAELA's Not Ready For Prime Time Players performed two amusing scenes from "Sly Fox" with proceeds donated to the Alzheimer's Association of Memphis.
• NAELA's PAC sponsored a tour of Graceland with dinner at the Elvis Presley Car Museum.
• NAELA's President Mark Shalloway impersonated "The King" (born in 1935) as a 72 year old senior citizen complete with walking supporter and nurses.

From a structured settlement perspective, the following NAELA presentations were especially valuable:   

• "Representing the Unwary Client After the Purchase of Unsuitable Annuities"
  
  • Andrew S. Friedman, an Arizona plaintiff attorney who specializes in class action lawsuits, summarized current class action lawsuits against insurers and insurance agents who sell deferred annuities to senior citizens.
  • None of the defendants Friedman identified appear to be NSSTA or SSP members.
  • Although the annuity products (equity-indexed vs. fixed annuities) and the sales targets (elderly persons vs. personal injury victims) are different, structured settlements (at least the primary market) appear to share many of the business practices Friedman described.
  • According to Friedman:
    • The equity-indexed annuities are sold through "independent insurance agents";
    • Many of these insurance agents:
      • Promote their professional expertise with:
        • Bogus credentials (example: "Certified Estate Planning Specialist") resulting from a one or two day "certification program"; and
        • Assurances that state insurance departments regulate insurance sales practices - which, according to Friedman, is totally inadequate to prevent sales abuses.
      • Invariably recommend annuities and do not sell any other product;
      • Do not undertake any due diligence to prevent misleading or incomplete sales presentations;
      • Promise high rates of return, safety, liquidity and assets sheltered from potential creditors with no taxation;
      • Intentionally conceal or fail to disclose important information about their products;
      • Engage in the unauthorized practice of law;
      • Make sales misrepresentations and omissions - for example: "you don't pay me anything".
      • Develop marketing and sales materials that appeal to vulnerable elderly investors and exploit their fears of risky or insecure investments and living out their retirement years without financial security.
    • The insurance companies pretend to be innocent and to know nothing about these allegedly unethical business practices;
    • The class litigation claims include RICO conspiracy charges against three groups:
      • Annuity companies;
      • Insurance sales agents;
      • Related companies that assist with product development, marketing and administration.
• "Advocating for the Most Vulnerable: Financial Exploitation Lawsuits to Discover and Recover Assets Stolen from Persons with Disabilities"
  • Charles P. Golbert, Deputy Public Guardian for the Office of the Cook County Public Guardian, explained how financial exploitation of elderly and disabled persons is becoming more common and widespread.
  • Golbert summarized the common legal theories for recovery:
    • Incapacity;
    • Undue influence, coercion and duress;
    • Breach of fiduciary duty; and
    • Fraud.
• "Comprehensive Representation of Personal Injury Plaintiffs and Special Needs Trusts"
  • Frank Johns, an expert in disability rights, special needs trusts and legal ethics, outlined a process for elder law attorneys to negotiate their engagement for special needs trusts in personal injury litigation.
  • Johns' presentation included annotated documentation addressing as many as five potential roles for elder law attorneys:
    • Drafting the special needs trust;
    • Appearing in court to obtain approval of the trust;
    • Drafting a qualified settlement fund;
    • Administering a qualified settlement fund;
    • Drafting an RFP for potential structured settlement consultants;
  • Johns' proposed RFP for structured settlement consultants:
    • Addresses structured settlement:
      • Roles;
      • Expertise; and
      • Services.
    • Does not currently address structured settlement compensation issues.
• Clifton Kruse, Jr. Professionalism and Ethics Luncheon Address
  • Miriam Piven Cotler's presentation was one of multiple NAELA programs that addressed ethical issues;
  • Cotler warned against common perceptions and misperceptions about the elderly including the dangers of becoming paternalistic.
  • According to Cotler, when the primary issues relate to power and control, "you can forget about ethics".
• "Why Can't We All Just Get Along: The Battle Between Special Needs Trusts, Retirement Accounts and Tax Rules"
  • Bradley J. Frigon, a NAELA Director who recently participated as a featured speaker at the NSSTA 2007 Fall Regional Meeting, addressed this complicated relationship of overlapping and sometimes conflicting laws.
  • One recommended follow-up would be a similar presentation about the relationship among special needs trusts, personal injury settlements and tax rules.   
    
  • Concept maps represent a valuable communication tool for explaining and discussing complex overlapping legal rules.

Congratulations to NAELA for an educational and enjoyable Advanced Elder Law Institute.  NAELA's 20th Anniversary 2008 Symposium will take place May 14-18 at the  Hyatt Regency Maui Resort and Spa.

For additional S2KM reporting about NAELA, see:

• NAELA Annuity Policy White Paper
• NAELA 2006 Advanced Institute
   

SSP 2007 Fall Meeting

The Society of Settlement Planners (SSP), hosted its 2007 Fall Meeting September 8 at the Camelback Inn in Scottsdale AZ. SSP is a national nonprofit educational and public policy association of professional structured settlement producers and other professionals who assist injured claimants in the settlement process.

During the past three years, SSP has offered outstanding structured settlement and settlement planning educational programs. Earlier this year, SSP announced the creation of a new Registered Settlement Planner (RSP) professional designation. The first RSP program is scheduled to begin today in affiliation with Texas Tech University.

For summaries of prior SSP educational programs, see these earlier S2KM blog posts:

• SSP 2007 Annual Meeting
• SSP's 2007 Educational Seminar
• SSP to Create Professional Designation
• SSP 2006 Annual Meeting
• SSP's 2005 Annual Meeting

Highlights of SSP's 2007 Fall meeting included educational presentations by SSP members for the following topics:

• Medicaid Liens - At SSP's 2007 Annual Meeting, Matt Garretson summarized his paper titled "What does the Ahlborn Case Really Mean?" In Ahlborn, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Eighth Circuit's decision limiting a state Medicaid agency to reimbursement from only that portion of a judgment or settlement that represents payment for medical expenses. At SSP's Fall 2007 Meeting, attorney Greg Maxwell continued SSP's analysis of Medicaid liens. Maxwell discussed preliminary responses by state Medicaid agencies to Ahlborn and identified lien resolution services as an increasingly important settlement planning service and skill set. For additional information about Medicaid lien resolution, see section 15.04[4] of "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" as well as Matt Garretson's new book "Negotiating and Settling Tort Cases".
• Personal Injury Tax Planning - Jesus Longoria, a Texas-based financial planner, discussed several settlement planning tax issues including punitive damages; confidentiality agreements; alternative minimum tax; and commutation riders. Longoria's presentation also featured a product developed by Amicus Financial Advisors that calculates projected taxes on various settlement options. Longoria's presentation did not detail two important settlement planning tax issues addressed by attorney Robert W. Wood in recent S2KM blog posts and podcasts - IRC section 468B funds and structured attorney fees. Wood also authors "Taxation of Damage Awards and Settlement Payments", a definitive hardcopy textbook that encompasses personal injury tax planning.
• Dissipation Risk - Professor Joe Tombs of Texas Tech University delivered an entertaining presentation about dissipation risk titled "The Elephant in the Room". Tombs' conclusions: 1) Financial planners generally ignore dissipation risk; 2) Dissipation risk defines settlement planning; and 3) Settlement planners must teach personal injury claimants how to manage their impulses. Tombs also introduced a new Amicus product that he has titled the "Tombs' Dissipation Index" (TDI). According to Professor Tombs', the TDI measures (on a scale of 1 to 100) the relative propensity of individual settlement recipients for dissipation risk. The most important indicators: education and physical fitness. Had time permitted, it would have been interesting to hear Professor Tombs address these additional dissipation-related topics:
  • How inadequate settlement amounts (compared with projected injury-related expenses) and unexpected (and unplanned for) future events impact settlement planning and dissipation analysis?
  • What impact, if any, pre-litigation funding and post-settlement funding (factoring) have on settlement planning and dissipation analysis?
  • How factoring, from a dissipation perspective, impacts a settlement planner's financial and insurance product recommendations?
• Annuities and Managed Money - Paul Lesti, author of a structured settlement treatise, repeated a presentation he originally delivered at the AAJ 2006 Winter Meeting as part of a debate with Rich Halpern. One of the results of Lesti's debate with Halpern was the distribution by Halpern of widely-discussed (within the structured settlement industry) opinion letters by two law professors, Stephen Saltzburg and Edwin Chemerinsky. These opinion letters highlight the obligations of plaintiff attorneys, under the ABA's Model Rules for Professional Conduct, to understand and inform their clients about proposed structured settlement compensation arrangements and to secure their client's "informed consent" for any such compensation arrangement. Although Lesti's presentation provided a persuasive summary of the advantages of structured settlement annuities, Lesti did not:
  • Address the settlement planning issues raised by Professors Saltzburg and Chemerinsky;
  • Define "managed money" for purposes of settlement planning;
  • Discuss the role and interaction of settlement trusts (managed money) and annuities in preserving government benefits.
• Settlement Planning - Jack Meligan summarized examples of Settlement Professional Inc's (SPI) settlement plans and settlement planning strategies. SPI's settlement planning approach focuses on empowering personal injury victims to control and direct their own settlement planning. For future SSP educational programs, Meligan should be encouraged to expand his excellent presentation to address the following issues:
  • What is settlement planning and how does it differ, from a product and knowledge perspective, from:
    • Structured settlements?
    • Special needs planning?
  • How do settlement planners identify and collaborate with settlement trust providers?
  • How does factoring (and the secondary insurance markets generally) impact settlement planning?
• Annuity Testimony - Jack Meligan and Paul Lesti teamed up to provide a valuable and enlightened analysis of annuity testimony. When offered as proof of present value in personal injury litigation, annuity testimony generally is provided by defendants as a trial strategy for limiting economic damages. Chapter 12 of "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" provides a traditional, defense-oriented analysis of annuity testimony. In their presentation, Meligan and Lesti looked at annuity testimony from the perspective of settlement planners working with  plaintiff attorneys to challenge and defeat annuity testimony by defendants. Their analysis included trial tactics as well as how to use annuity testimony expertise as a marketing advantage.
• Medical Imagery - What does medical imagery have to do with settlement planning? Quite a bit - if you listen to the representatives of Bio-Sim Corporation, who made a brief presentation at the SSP meeting. Bio-Sim, whose work is featured on the television show, Grey's Anatomy, believes their work product can substantially reduce settlement time - and improve settlement results for plaintiffs. Bio-Sim also offers referral fees to settlement planners. Which raises this question: if you are a settlement planner focused on marketing to plaintiff attorneys, what products and services should you be offering?

For an association that purports to be a protector of claimants rights, it was surprising SSP did not address the following important settlement planning issues as part of its Fall 2007 Meeting:

• Executive Life of New York - NSSTA has created a Task Force. SSP should at least provide its members with a status report.
• 2007 POMS - how are SSP and NSSTA tracking this issue? - specifically what new POMS sections are being proposed for annuities, structured settlements, assignment rights and special needs trusts?
• State Medicaid responses (and related judicial responses) to the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 - Sylvius von Saucken introduced this issue to SSP members at SSP's 2007 Annual Meeting and to NSSTA members at the NSSTA 2007 Annual Meeting.
• Transparency and informed consent for all settlement planning compensation. SSP should continue its leadership with these issues.
• Single Claimant 468B Funds - What is the strategy to secure clarification by the U.S. Treasury confirming single claimant 468B funds? 
• Rebating
  • Which statutes define rebating?
  • Which rebating practices (plaintiff and defendant), are:
    • Legal vs. illegal; and
    • Represent good vs. unacceptable business practices?
• Macomber case - Having featured this case at its 2006 Annual Meeting, SSP should provide an update for its members about the Macomber settlement.
• State structured settlement protection statutes - NSSTA provides educational presentations about these statutes for its members.  Why not SSP?

In addition to SSP's educational presentations in Scottsdale, SSP's President Anthony Alfieri chaired a discussion about SSP's organizational and promotional issues. Here are some related and unsollicited S2KM recommendations for SSP:

• Continue to identify and recruit structured settlement and settlement planning industry leaders who share SSP's values and priorities - even if they compete with you and challenge your viewpoints on important issues.
• Establish communication with other settlement planning associations - including NSSTA; NAELA; NAMSAP; NASP; ASNP; and SNA. Focus on shared issues and collaboration opportunities. Attend the Stetson Law School SNT seminar.
• Use a wiki to publish online (publicly or privately) the current draft of SSP's Code of Ethics. Sollicit and review comments and improvements.
• Learn web 2.0 (aka social network) technologies to improve SSP's online identity as well as SSP's  communication, learning and operating efficiencies.

Structured Settlement Educational Programs - Fall 2007

Fall of 2007 features many association meetings and educational events that should interest structured settlement attorneys, other structured settlement professionals and stakeholders.

This S2KM blog post:

• Highlights these Fall 2007 meetings and educational events; and
• Features related commentary and analysis from S2KM and structured settlement knowledge leaders.

National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA)

• 2007 Certified Structured Settlement Consultant (CSSC) Seminar - October 3-7 at the University of Notre Dame.
• 2007 NSSTA Fall Regional Meeting - October 10-12 in Tampa, FL.
• Prior S2KM coverage of NSSTA
  • NSSTA 2007 Winter Meeting
  • NSSTA Bylaw Amendments
  • NSSTA 2006 Fall Regional Meeting
  • NSSTA 2006 Annual Meeting

Society of Settlement Planners (SSP)

• 2007 SSP Fall Meeting - September 7-8 in Scottsdale, AZ
• 2007 SSP Registered Settlement Planner (RSP) Program: First Course - September 10 to December 12 at Texas Tech University.
• Prior S2KM coverage of SSP
  • SSP 2007 Annual Meeting
  • SSP's 2007 Educational Seminar
  • SSP to Create Professional Designation
  • SSP 2006 Annual Meeting
  • SSP's 2005 Annual Meeting

National Association of Settlement Purchasers (NASP)

• 2007 NASP Annual Meeting - October 18-19 in Washington, D.C.
• Prior S2KM coverage of NASP
  • NASP 2006 Annual Meeting
  • How the Primary Market Views Factoring

National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA)

• 2007 NAELA Advanced Elder Law Institute - November 2-4 in Memphis, TN
• Prior S2KM coverage of NAELA
  • NAELA Annuity Policy White Paper
  • NAELA 2006 Advanced Institute

Special Needs Planners

• Special Needs Planning associations and educational institutions include:
  • Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP): Ask2007 Program - October 18 in Clearwater, FL
  • Special Needs Alliance (SNA): Fall 2007 Meeting - October 20 in Clearwater, FL
  • Stetson Law School - Special Needs Trust Program: October 18-19 in Clearwater, FL
• Prior S2KM blog posts about special needs planning
  • Academy of Special Needs Planners
  • Structured Settlements and Government Benefits
  • The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005
  • Inconvenient Questions
  • Selecting a Settlement Trustee
  • Special Needs Trusts
  • Settlement Trusts
• S2KM wiki for special needs planners
  • Structured Settlement Law

National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP)

• NAMSAP's 2007 Annual Meeting - November 2 in San Diego
• Prior S2KM coverage of NAMSAP
  • NAMSAP
  • Medicare Set-Aside Arrangements

American Association for Justice (AAJ)

• AAJ's two annual conventions for 2007 have already occurred.
• Prior S2KM coverage of AAJ
  • AAJ 2007 Annual Conference
  • AAJ 2007 Winter Meeting
  • AAJ 2006 Annual Meeting

Additional Educational Resources - for structured settlement attorneys, other professionals and stakeholders:

• Attorney Joseph J. Dehner addresses:
  • Structured Settlement Public Policy;
  • The DOJ's Structured Settlement Program
• Attorney Robert W. Wood addresses:
  • Structured Attorney Fees
  • Single Claimant 468B Fund
  • Structured Settlements: Factor vs. Commute?
• Additional S2KM blog posts, podcasts, wikis and concept maps:
  
  • Web 2.0 for Lawyers
• Social Network Technologies
• Introduction to Podcasting
• Knowledge Management and Structured Settlements
• Concept Maps
• Overview of the Structured Settlement Markets
• Structured Settlement Public Policy
• The Future of Structured Settlements
• Structured Settlement Transfers - aka factoring
• Structured Settlements and Government Benefits

• Hardcopy legal textbooks:
  • "Negotiating and Settling Tort Cases" - by Matt Garretson and Guy O. Kornblum
  • "Structured Settlements and Periodic Payment Judgments" - by Daniel W. Hindert, Joseph J. Dehner and Patrick J. Hindert
  • "Taxation of Damage Awards and Settlement Payments" - by Robert W. Wood

AAJ 2007 Annual Convention - 1

Today is the first day of the American Association for Justice (AAJ) 2007 Annual Convention at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Chicago.  This author is attending the AAJ Convention as an AAJ member.

The AAJ Annual Convention is the largest and most important meeting of attorneys who are structured settlement stakeholders.  Many structured settlement companies are featured prominently among AAJ's donors, advertisers, exhibitors, sponsors, and affiliates.

By contrast, however, AAJ's 2007 educational program (both the Winter Meeting and this Annual Convention) completely ignores structured settlements.   For this 2007 Annual Convention:

• AAJ's educational program includes more than 250 presentations over five days - without one presentation addressing structured settlements;
• AAJ's two volume hardcopy educational manual contains more than 2500 pages - without a single reference to structured settlements.

Why should plaintiff attorneys study structured settlements?  And what should they be studying?

Several AAJ members, including Richard Risk, Matt Garretson and Daniel Hindert, have written about potential professional liabilities plaintiff attorneys face related to structured settlements.  These liabilities can result from a plaintiff attorney's failure to competently advise clients about structured settlements or related settlement planning options and issues. 

Since 2001, federal and state legislatures have enacted important new laws impacting structured settlements. Prominent among these new laws are: IRC section 5891; 46 state structured settlement protection statutes; the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 plus related state Medicaid legislation.  AAJ has not provided any educational programs about any of these new laws.

A recent marketing survey conducted on behalf of the National Structured Settlement Trade Association (NSSTA) found that 95% of plaintiff attorneys surveyed said they are proponents of structured settlements. The survey also found, however, that only 7% of personal injury settlements between $75,000 and $100,000 include a structured settlement compared with only 30% of settlements over $1 million. One significant problem and explanation, based upon this author's experience, is that few plaintiff attorneys are sufficiently knowledgable about structured settlement laws to properly advise their clients. 

During AAJ's 2006 Winter meeting, opinion letters written by law professors Stephen Saltzburg and Erwin Chemerinsky were presented which argued that plaintiff attorneys have a professional responsibility to obtain their clients "informed consent" as to any and all structured settlement compensation arrangements.  Unfortunately, AAJ has not provided any educational follow-up about this strategically important professional responsibility - and opportunity to advance "justice" for personal injury victims.

AAJ can and should help improve plaintiff attorneys' knowledge and professional competence about structured settlements. Preliminary suggestions:

• AAJ should develop a new educational category about negotiation and settlement and include structured settlements. A new book, "Negotiating and Settling Tort Cases", written by Matt Garretson and Guy Kornblum and featured at the beginning of AAJ's 2007 Educational Reference Materials, could provide a preliminary reference book.
  
• Among other topics, this proposed new AAJ educational category should address: 
  
  • General topics:   
    
    • Public policy related to negotiating and settling tort cases on behalf of injury victims;
    • Structured settlements;      
    • Personal injury settlement planning;      
    • Special needs planning;
    • Medicaid and Medicare liens;
    • Pre-litigation funding;
    • The secondary insurance markets.   
      
  • Legislation (and related regulations and case law) directly impacting structured settlements;
    • IRC  sections  104(a); 130; 468B; 5891;
  • State structured settlement protection statutes;
  • Deficit Reduction Act of 2005;
  • Medicare Secondary Payer rules.
  • Settlement trusts related to structured settlements including:
    • 468B funds;
  • Special needs trusts;
  • Pooled trusts;
  • Medicare set-aside arrangements.

S2KM will provide additional coverage from the AAJ 2007 Annual Convention during the next few days.

For previous S2KM blog posts about AAJ and ATLA, see:

• AAJ 2007 Winter Meeting
• ATLA 2006 Annual Meeting

Academy of Special Needs Planners

The Academy of Special Needs Planners (ASNP) hosted its first annual conference March 23-24, 2007 at the Marriott Evergreen Conference Resort in Stone Mountain, Georgia. Open to non-ASNP members, the conference attracted more than 100 participants (mostly disability attorneys) and showcased ASNP's knowledge leaders among the 15 speakers.

This report looks at the ASNP conference specifically from a structured settlement perspective.

Conclusions and recommendations:

• ASNP's collective legal knowledge is extensive, impressive and important for disabled persons, their families, plaintiff attorneys and structured settlement professionals.
• The ASNP conference speakers and handout materials were excellent. Except for the structured settlement handouts (one written in 1996), almost all of the handout materials appeared to be written or updated specifically for this ASNP conference.
• Although most of the ASNP conference topics related indirectly to structured settlements:
  • None of the ASNP speakers or topics focused directly on structured settlement legal issues;
  • No one from the traditional structured settlement industry attended the ASNP conference or exhibited at the ASNP conference.
• Expanding the structured settlement market requires expanded legal knowledge, scholarship and advocacy.
• One priority topic: how do (and how should) government benefit rules interact with structured settlements?
• Special needs law should incorporate structured settlement legal issues and funding options within its scope of competencies, education and expertise.
• ASNP members should understand structured settlements - and offer legal services to plaintiff attorneys for structured settlement funding options such as:
  
  • Qualified (under IRC section 130) assignments;
  • Non-qualified (under IRC section 130) assignments;
  • Qualified (under IRC section 468B) settlement funds;
  • Self-settled special needs trusts - funded with structured settlement annuities;
  • Pooled trusts - funded with structured settlement annuities;
  • Medicare set-aside arrangements - funded with structured settlement annuities; and
  • Structured settlement factoring transactions - as defined in IRC section 5891 and the 46 state structured settlement protection statutes.

What follows is S2KM's summary of the 2007 ASNP conference presentations - highlighting related structured settlement issues which S2KM encourages ASNP members to address in future ASNP conferences, legal research and legal commentary.

Vincent Russo opened the program with an impressive overview of the "Tax Consequences of Trusts in a Special Needs Practice". S2KM would like to see Russo (and other special needs tax experts) incorporate and address these IRC sections in their SNT analysis: 104(a); 130; 468B; and 5891 - including statutory definitions and penalties. What recommendations can ASNP offer for resolving apparent conflicts among Medicaid, Medicare and tax laws related to structured settlements?

Diedre Wachbrit and Ira Wiesner highlighted special needs advisors and optional protection clauses In their presentation titled "Advanced Drafting Issues: Care Committees, Trust Protectors and Distribution Provisions". S2KM would like to see Wachbrit and Wiesner address advanced drafting issues for SNTs funded with structured settlement annuities. These issues include assignment language; beneficiary designations; and annuity payment rights transfer strategies.

Frank Johns and Patricia Dudek spoke about "Ethics and Administration of Special Needs Trusts, Pooled and Independent". Structured settlements and settlement transfers create many ethical and administration issues for SNTs. The ethics issues include: conflicts of interest; fee arrangements; requirements for disclosure, confidentiality and informed consent; scope of representation; and allocation of authority.  The administration issues specific to structured settlements in SNTs include settlement transfer issues. Johns is already a recognized and published knowledge leader for structured settlement ethical issues. S2KM hopes Johns, Dudek and ASNP will continue to focus on structured settlement ethical and administration issues.

Susan Hartley, Martha Ford and William Browning spoke about pooled trusts. Ford's presentation was valuable in understanding the original legislative intent and process in 1993 that created statutory safe harbors for (d)(4)(A) and (C) trusts. Hartley addressed pooled trust management and administrative issues. Browning was simultaneously amusing and insightful while defending and promoting the growing use of pooled trusts. S2KM questions: what role should structured settlement annuities play in pooled trusts? What are the advantages and disadvantages of structured settlement annuities compared with other funding options for pooled trusts?

Michael Gilfix, David Lillesand and Ken Brown examined current SSI issues. Responding to questions following his presentation, Brown stated SSA will issue new POMS in 2007 and the POMS will address structured settlements. Issues S2KM would like these experts to address:

• The roles of SSA, CMS and state Medicaid agencies in determining structured settlement annuity rules for Medicaid eligibility;
• Current SSI rules for structured settlement annuities - and the legal authority for such rules;
• The impact of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 on structured settlement annuities.

Carrie Frank offered a plaintiff attorney perspective for special needs attorneys. Her presentation referenced structured settlements and highlighted qualified settlement funds. S2KM encourages ASNP to continue examining the issues Frank identified:

• What is the scope of legal knowledge, responsibilities and liabilities for special needs and personal injury settlement planning?
• What standards and competencies do (should) plaintiff attorneys possess for special needs and personal injury settlement planning?
• What are the appropriate roles, responsibilities, competencies, and compensation for various settlement and special needs planning participants?
• What are the most important structured settlement legal issues related to special needs planning?

John Campbell presented a detailed look at Medicare and Medicaid liens as well as Medicare Set-Aside trusts. Campbell referenced structured settlements and highlighted the growing interaction of Medicare and Medicaid (Medicare Set-aside Special Needs Trusts). S2KM welcomes and encourages Campbell's continuing commentary about structured settlements - especially the conflicting Medicare and Medicaid rules for structured settlements.

The ASNP sponsors and exhibitors greatly enhanced the ASNP conference.

• Notably and coincidentally, MassMutual Financial Group (which recently left the structured settlement industry) was the Platinum Sponsor for ASNP's first conference.
• ASNP conference exhibitors included:
  
  • First Capital Surety & Trust Company;
  • Knights Administration;
  • Krause Financial Services;
  • MetDESK; and
  • Smart Marketing.
• The exhibitor handout materials were surprisingly valuable - especially:
  
  • Krause Financial Services' Medicaid Annuity handouts; and
  • Mass Mutual's 2006 Resource Guide.
• Although MetLife appears to be among the leaders in estate planning for special kids, the MetLife marketing materials do not reference structured settlements.

Congratulations to Harry Margolis and other ASNP founders and members.  Stay focused on structured settlement legal issues.  The structured settlement industry needs your legal expertise to help understand and resolve many of the "Inconvenient Questions" it now faces.